Slide 1 of 4
You are watching this as an architect
An operator watches to learn what to do with an item. You are watching to decide where gates belong and who stands behind them.
Governing agentic GTM
WatchLesson 4 of 7Route the review
Approvals as a governance control
See the approval mechanism from the governance side: what the gate is, what it records, and what you are deciding when you place one.
12 minAdvanced
Part 1 of 2
The same video, a different question
This video also appears in the Launchpad track, where the question is what to do when an item arrives in front of you. Here the question is different: where should gates exist at all, who should stand behind each one, and what does the system record when a decision is made.
Watch for the evidence trail specifically. Each approval records who decided what, when, and against what supporting material. That record is what makes governance in this model demonstrable rather than assumed. It is what you would show someone asking how a decision was reached, and it is why an approval is a governance artefact and not just a workflow step.
Part 2 of 2
Approvals are a budget you are spending
The framing to carry into the next lesson is that review capacity is finite and every gate spends some of it. This is not an argument for fewer gates; it is an argument for placing them deliberately, because the alternative is spending the budget uniformly across consequential and inconsequential work alike.
That is what a blanket approval policy does. It looks maximally cautious and produces the opposite: a queue where everything requires a decision is a queue people clear rather than read, so the items that genuinely needed scrutiny received the same three seconds as everything else. The next lesson is about spending the budget on purpose.
Now watch the video
How approvals work
This lesson is the orientation. The material itself lives on its own page, kept in one place so it stays current everywhere it is referenced.
Key questions
You should be able to answer each of these from memory before opening it. Recalling the answer is what makes it stick; recognizing it when you read it does not.
What does each approval leave behind, and why does it matter here?
A record of who decided what, when, and against what evidence. That trail is what makes the governance demonstrable rather than assumed, and it is what you would show someone asking how a decision was reached.
In what sense is a gate a cost?
It spends finite review capacity. Gating everything spends that budget uniformly across consequential and inconsequential work, which buys less scrutiny where it mattered, not more.
What to take away
- Approval is attention, and attention is finite. Spend it where the risk is.
- Every run leaves a record. That is what makes the model auditable rather than merely trusted.
Teach this lesson
The argument in 4 slides, for presenting it to your team
Slide 2 of 4
Every decision leaves a record
Who approved what, when, and on what evidence. That trail is the governance artefact. It is what makes the model auditable rather than merely careful.
Slide 3 of 4
A gate costs attention
- Every approval consumes someone's scarce review capacity
- Gating everything spends it uniformly, including where nothing was at stake
- Placement is a budgeting decision
Slide 4 of 4
Leads directly into severity
The next lesson is about spending that budget deliberately — mapping severity to the people who should hold each level.
Demo
Try the demo.
See agents carry the repeatable work of GTM across sales, marketing, customer success, and RevOps. Every action prepared, reviewed, and recorded. Fictional data, real product.
Explore the demo